Feeding width meaning of jaw crusher model parameters
Feeding width (also called feed opening width) is one of the core marked parameters of a jaw crusher, usually the horizontal width of the top feed inlet. It is the main basis for jaw crusher model naming, e.g., PE 600×900 jaw crusher: 600 mm = feeding width, 900 mm = feed opening depth.
Core definition
Feeding width: the maximum horizontal distance between the two side liners at the crusher feed opening.
Note: It is not the maximum lump size of raw material. Rule of thumb: the maximum feed lump size should generally be 80%–85% of the feeding width, to avoid material jamming and bridging at the inlet.
Functions & significance
- Model identification standard: PE/PEV series jaw crushers are conventionally named by feeding width × feed depth. Customers can quickly judge machine size at a glance.
- Raw material limitation: It sets an upper limit for the block size of incoming ore. Oversized rocks cannot enter the crushing chamber and need pre-screening or secondary blasting.
- Capacity reference indicator: Larger feeding width usually matches a larger crushing cavity, supporting higher hourly throughput, on the premise of matched motor power and discharge setting.
- Equipment layout matching: Engineers use feeding width to select the matched feeder width. The feeder’s effective feeding width should be slightly smaller than crusher feed width for smooth feeding.
Distinction from easy‑confused parameters
- Feeding width: Horizontal dimension of feed port (the first number in model)
- Feed opening depth: Vertical distance from top inlet to the turning point of jaw plate (the second number in model)
- Maximum feed size: Recommended actual largest ore block, always less than feeding width
- Discharge opening: Adjustable gap at the bottom outlet, controls finished product particle size
Practical reminder
If raw stones frequently exceed 85% of feeding width, frequent blocking, uneven jaw plate wear, overload current and machine vibration will occur. For hard rock mines, the safety margin is suggested to be increased to 75%–80% of feeding width.
